Monthly Archives: April 2009

The Path Of Least Resistance

thepathofleastresistance

Attendance: Chris, Justin, Mike, Vora, Ram

At first glance, The Path of Least Resistance looks like a sweet, innocent and easy read. It comes in paperback form and has a small physical imprint. However, it does not take long after beginning to read the book before one realizes that it is actually dense, thought provoking and controversial. It also made for one of the more difficult discussions we have had so far.

Robert Fritz starts his book by explaining how everything tends to follow the path of least resistance. This is true of water in a stream, or walking through a house. Things follow the structures that are setup for them. Upon establishing this basic concept, the rest of the book is a thorough examination of two different structures.

The first structure examined is the one that is commonly used by most people. It is what Fritz calls the reactive-responsive orientation and it is the lens that most people view life through. The reactive-responsive orientation is focused on circumstantial problem resolution. Something broke? Fix it. Have a fight? Win it. Overweight? Go on a diet. People starving? Feed them. He says these structures are not actually resolvable because only the symptoms are being addressed. Diets don’t work because the people on them still like food. Feeding the poor is only good for a day because it leaves them with no way for them to feed themselves going forward. The internal conflict still remains. Efforts in this orientation are ultimately futile, but this is nevertheless how people try to operate.

The second structure examined is the one that Fritz hopes you will begin using. It is called the creative orientation. It is driven by the desire to make something exist, or to create things just because a person wants them to be. Painters, writers, and composers all use this orientation when making things come into being. The revelation here is that this structure can be applied into any area where things are not already in the state you would hope for them to be in.

Create a vision, decide that you want it to be, formally make a commitment to it, and then make it happen. That is the essence of the creative orientation. Don’t like being overweight? Focus on the desired result. What do you really want? Do you want to be on a diet? Not really, that is the process. OK, what is it you really want then? “I want to be healthy.” How healthy? Decide that too. Now you have done the essential thing for bringing something into being. This is focusing on the desired result, rather than focusing on the process. You now have a chance at being successful.

While I have attempted to break down the basic concept of the book into a few short sentences, the book is very dense, and I ended up with 3 full pages of mind map by the end. Usually, I can easily fit a good book into one and half pages. The density of this book made for a difficult read and discussion for the group.

Some of the problems we ran into were:

- A general confusion on some of the basic concepts of the book. Ironically, the thorough detail in the book made it hard for some to digest even the simpler parts.

- A bit of controversy. Can you really switch to the creative orientation for everything? Don’t you still need to address the problems that exist? Does this really make sense through the lens of business?

- What about unexpected circumstances? Is the creative orientation helpful here?

- A general lack of time. There were too many details and opinions in this book to cover them all in two hours. I was unable to achieve the right level of balance between concept and detail to emerge from the discussion with a proper conclusion.

My hope is that upon further reflection, the members will be able to swallow the concepts and use them in making decisions. I know I plan to.

——————Questions used for discussion——————————————————-

1) What is the central idea or premise of The Path Of Least Resistance? What are some of the problems or issues raised?

2) Describe the reactive-response orientation. What are it’s basic characteristics? Do you tend to operate out of this orientation?

3) What are the basic steps of the creative process? How does this process differ from the traditional model of problem solving? Do you really think the creative orientation is that much different from the reactive-responsive orientation?

4) Tension seeks Resolution. How does tension become a serious problem in a structural conflict? Can you solve a structural conflict? What other ways do you deal with structural conflict? Can you give an example of being stuck within a structural conflict from your own life?

5) Structural tension involves having a tension resolution where the tendency is to resolve completely. How is this different from a structural conflict? Can tension actually be useful in the creative process?

6) Fritz says the best place to start the creative process is at the end. Why is it so important to focus on a vision? When you start a project, do you spend enough time focusing on the vision? How does this process work for you? Is there anything that gets in the way of this type of thinking?

7) How does Choice come into play in the creative process? What are some typical ways people in the reactive responsive orientation make choices? How is Robert Fritz suggesting people operating the creative orientation make choices?

8) Fritz suggests there are three different types of choices made in the creative orientation, Primary, secondary and fundamental choice. What is the basic idea behind these decisions? Do you think that this model will help you make better decisions?

9) What do you think it means to become “the predominate creative force in your own life?” Can you see where you might be able to adjust your life or thought process to accomplish this?

10) Assimilation is the second step of the creative process, where you begin assemble your ideas into tangible assets. What makes this stage different from germination? How can you give this stage the best chance of success?

11) What mistakes do people commonly make when assessing reality? How can reality assessment become a distraction in the creative process? Can you be successful without keeping your current situation in mind?

12) Why is completion a hard stage in the creative process for many people? Do you sometimes have a hard time accepting something as completed?

13) What have you learned in this book that you can apply by next Tuesday?

The Creative Habit

thecreativehabit

Attendance: Chris, Mike, Vora, Chris D.

There is a common misconception that creativity is not important in business. In fact, some people believe creativity is frowned upon. That may be true in some cases, but creativity actually plays a huge role in business. Think of any highly successful person or business, and you will undoubtedly find that they somewhere along the way learned to be very creative.

The creative habit was the third book in our group’s five part series on productivity and effectiveness. The book was an enjoyable read, and made for a surprisingly good discussion. This is the first time so far that the group has gone the full two hours, and I think we could have kept going longer if we hadn’t run out of time.

Now allow me to be candid for a moment: My initial reaction to this text was something like this, “well this is great if you want to be a writer or a director, but how on earth does it relate to business?” It’s not that I didn’t think creativity is important, it is that this book is written by a dance choreographer, and is the subject of English and Theatre class curriculums. The majority of her examples discuss things she learned from creating her shows. Is she really writing to business people? What is here for a CEO?

Upon reading the book more thoroughly, I realized that it certainly applies to business. Even though the examples are slanted towards theater, art, and Broadway, much of the book is actually about establishing rituals, finding new ideas, leveraging history and planning projects. It is absolutely relevant to anyone seeking to become more effective.

Now, doing the right stuff is important (Drucker), and so is making sure you are getting stuff done (Allen). But just doing these things alone is not going to make you into anything exceptional. If you really want to excel, you are going to have to learn to be creative. Creativity is a skill that can take effectiveness to the next level. It is one of the few things in this world that really set apart the greats from the worker bees.

–Questions used for Discussion–

1) What is the central idea or premise of the creative habit? What are some of the problems or issues raised?

2) What role does a book by a choreographer about creativity play into a book club about business? How do you think it fits into a book series on productivity and effectiveness?

3) What are some of the ways that the concept of creativity is used in the business world?

4) Most of the chapters in the creative habit have exercises in the back. Has anyone had a chance to complete some of them? What                   was your experience like? What are some of the more interesting exercises you read about?

5) Tharp believes that rituals should be a part of our lives. What types of rituals is she considering? What importance do  you place on rituals? Why are they important in the creative process?

6) What is creative DNA? How do you think this concept of creative DNA can be leveraged in a business setting?

7) Tharp goes into great detail about the many types of memory. What is the importance of memory in business?

8) Scratching is the process of searching for ideas. How can you find the best ideas? How do you know a good idea when you see one?

9) Before you can think outside of the box, you have to start with a box. What do you use for box, what would go into it?

10) Tharp advocates careful planning, but cautions against blindly sticking to a plan. In your own work, do you tend to see people over planning or under planning? What are some of the mistakes commonly made with planning? How do you strike the proper balance?

11) Tharp claims that skill is one of the most important components of the creative process. Why is skill so important? What skills is she referring to? How can you develop your own skills?

12) What have you learned in this book that you can apply by next Tuesday?

Getting Things Done

gettingthingsdone

Attendance: Chris, Justin, Roger, Vora

Having done a few of these meeting now, I’ve realized there is not really a standard format. Sure it is getting easier for me to make questions than at first, but different books call for different approaches. How To Read Faster in 10 Days left very little to discussion, we basically just reviewed the book which helped remember it. Drucker was much more philosophical and we spent most of the time focusing on how the contents relates to our lives rather than spending a whole lot of time in the book. Even though no two meetings are exactly the same, my goal is to walk out with a much better understanding than what I went in with.

Getting things Done was the groups 5th book, and probably the most action oriented and practical out of all of them so far. The book has a system which is so very detailed the approach I decided to take was to spend a lot of time focusing on each of the steps in the system. This would be the only way we could all fully realize the content of the system.

The first part of the discussion we basically spent reviewing the five steps of GTD. Each person picked one of the steps, briefly reviewed the section in the book, and then explained it to the others. Doing this really makes everyone focus on each step separately.

The highlights of the five steps found in GTD are:

1) Collect – This is the phase where you gather all of the stuff in your world into a common place. You are not allowed to think about what you will do with it at this point. The idea is just to throw it all in one place. Gather all your papers, write down all the stuff you know you need to do. After your initial implementation, you need to maintain an up to date inbox by putting items in it as they come in.

2) Process – You now most likely have a huge pile of stuff. You will go through each item in order and ask “What is this?” Assuming the item is actionable and not reference material, you can do three things with it, a) Throw it away 2) delegate it 3) defer it. If you can’t throw it away or delegate it, he suggests if you can do it in less than two minutes then go ahead and do it. If you can’t do it in less than two minutes then you need to put it into your organizational system.

3) Organize – Here you are putting all of your stuff into your system. The suggested system is heavy on lists. When you walk out of this process you will wind up with a set of all of the next actions, projects and contexts that make up your life.

4) Review – A big part of the system is constantly reviewing it. He suggests a weekly review in which you review your projects, next actions, and commitments. During the review you will not be doing any of the actions. You are just making sure your system is in order, because if you fail to keep it up, you will soon quit trusting and using it.

5) Do – Now that you have your whole world organized into a system, how do you know which thing to attack first?

He suggests evaluating the following components in order:

A) Context – Where are you? Most tasks require you to be at a certain place. Filter out your tasks by where you are.

B) Time – If you have a meeting in 30 minutes, why start a task you know is going to take you 3 solid hours? Instead knock of the task that will take you 30 minutes.

C) Energy – Some tasks require more energy than others, assess yours and pick the task most fitting.

D) Priority – Now that you’ve established you are at the right place, have the time and energy, what are the priorities of the remaining tasks?

After fleshing out the details of the system, we were able to move on and evaluate the high level premise of the book. Roger had this one covered and presented a long list of metaphors he had found throughout the book. The metaphors present an overall state desired by becoming more organized. The two that stuck in my head were “Ready for Anything” and a “Mind Like Water.” Ready for anything is like a martial arts practitioner standing in a ready state. He is calm and ready to attack. And a mind like water is having the perfect reaction to any disturbance. Picture a rock being thrown into a calm pond. The water will handle the disturbance and then return to a calm state.

The other metaphor I had been thinking of was David Allen’s use of the term RAM and Open Loops. To much stuff floating around in our head causes stress and loss of productivity. A catch all system of organization allows one to get rid of the typical contents of RAM and instead focus on the specific actions at hand.

We also discussed various other time management philosophies such as Stephen Covey, and how it differs from Getting Things Done. The traditional time management philosophies have always taken an approach of working with an overall purpose, then longer term goals, and then aligning our specific actions with those goals. Allen thinks that this is an unrealistic approach. We can blue sky all we want, but if we don’t have our life in order, how are we ever going to be able to focus on longer term goals? Instead, he suggests focusing on your “runway”, and then working your way up to specific projects, and then moving up from there. The point is not to ignore the higher levels, but instead to have our life organized first, and then work your way up higher.

At the end we finally got to discuss our plans and struggles with the implementation. I thought that how the system would turn a lot of people off by it’s complexity but surprisingly, everyone wanted to try it.

So far this week I have made a lot of progress with mine. I got the cheapest PDA on the planet (pocketmod.com), and dumped my head into an online GTD system (Nozbe).

———————————————————

Review Exercise: Five Step Process

Assign each of the following sections to a person or a group. Have them briefly study the section and then each will present this section to the rest of the group.

Collect pg 25

Process pg 31

Organize pg 35

Review pg 45

Do pg 48

1) Without going into the details of the methodology, what is the overall central idea or premise behind Getting Things Done? What are some of the problems or issues are raised?

2) After Explanation of Collect in the Review Exercise: The first phase of implementing GTD consists of gathering “your world” into a common inbox. Have you ever tried to do this? What can you imagine this experience would be like? Does it cause anxiety just thinking about it?

3) After Explanation of Organize in the Review Exercise: Processing and Organizing seem to have a lot of overlapping concepts, do you see any ways in which the concepts are different?

4) After Explanation of Do in the Review Exercise: Getting Things Done suggests a four criteria model for doing. The specific criteria to be evaluated are Context, Time Available, Energy, and Priority. How do you usually decide what to work on at a given time, and do you see yourself adopting this model instead?

5) People have been writing about time management for years, why do you think Allen felt it necessary to write another book on the subject. What separates this book from the rest?

6) Getting Things Done has been criticized as being overly complex. Do you think this system is realistic is it just another thing to manage? Is the effort involved with organizing worth the results and why?

7) Getting things Done leaves a lot of the specific implementation open to the users of the system. What are some of the more ways you can think of implementing GTD? Has anyone tried any specific methods or software?

8) To what degree are you likely to implement GTD into your life? What changes would be required in order to do so?